Visibility of the members of the peer review process in nursing journals

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51422/ren.v21i3.388

Keywords:

Visibility, Peer review, Scientific Comittee

Abstract

Various factors and processes intervene for a journal to have a great impact in the scientific and/or academic communities or in the general population, as well as for its continuity, aspects that may at times elude the keen eye of specialists or the discerning gaze of its audience. Some of these processes are developed below.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

SciELO Guidelines: The Peer Review Process in Journal Publishing [Internet]. Sao Paolo: SciElo Network

Meeting; 24 de septiembre de 2018. Disponible en: https://cutt.ly/a7P6RKc

López Jordi M del C, Piovesan S, Pereira V, Patrón C, Lima A. Proceso de arbitraje para la calidad de las

revistas científicas. Odontoestomatología [Internet]. 2019 [citado el 11 de agosto de 2022]; 21(34): 74-7.

doi: https://cutt.ly/O51Dwec

Downloads

Published

2023-05-03

How to Cite

Alba-Leonel, A., & Papaqui-Alba, S. (2023). Visibility of the members of the peer review process in nursing journals. Revista De Enfermería Neurológica, 21(3), 193–196. https://doi.org/10.51422/ren.v21i3.388

Issue

Vol. 21 No. 3 (2022): Revista de Enfermería Neurológica

Section

Editorial

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Revista de Enfermería Neurológica

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.